Pulling from the book, The Book of Nothing, by John D. Barrow, Georg Cantor is quoted as saying,
“Because of this extraordinary position which distinguishes mathematics from all other sciences, and which produces and explanation for the relatively free and easy way of pursuing it, it especially deserves the name of free mathematics, a designation which I, if I had the choice, would prefer to the customary ‘pure’ mathematics”
Our labeling of math as “pure” and alternatively, “applied” has been existence for more than 100 years. I’m not sure who labeled it thus. Certainly those partaking in “pure” research present and past hold their heads a little higher because they feel they are doing something more noble and righteous than the sell-out applied mathematicians- who are obviously not interested in mathematics for mathematics’ sake. But that doesn’t mean it wasn’t the applied mathematicians trying to segregate themselves from the abstract to show that they were dealing with something which actually made sense in our world.
Let me paint a possible picture for you. Back in 1900, the Applieds are spending their time trying to convince congress that their calculations guarantee the success of a flying hot hair balloon made of metal. Congress recently heard from a Pure trying to get funding about one infinity being larger than the other. This sadly puts them off from all mathematicians, because the mathematicians speak in tongues no one can understand. Now the, trying to split themselves from their jargon-filled brethren, Applieds point furiously to the Pures to say, “Nay! Do not lump me in with those loonies! I am not a Pure, I am an Applied and I assure you that my math connects with reality!”




shelf which contain more history than mathematics. There are several other common books,